Prediction of Bruce Kleege vs Celso Sacomandi Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Kleege vs C. Sacomandi

Bruce Kleege

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

148

Best Rank

339

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Celso Sacomandi

BRA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

148

Best Rank

339

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Kleege 2 - 0 Sacomandi

They have played 4 sets in total, with Bruce Kleege winning 4 and Celso Sacomandi winning 0. The last match between Bruce Kleege and Celso Sacomandi was at the Brasilia CH, 09-08-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Bruce Kleege getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Kleege	2
Sacomandi	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Brasilia CH(08-09-82)

Stats

Bruce Kleege

Celso Sacomandi

(R3) Brasilia CH(08-10-81)

Stats

Bruce Kleege

Celso Sacomandi

B. Kleege vs C. Sacomandi H2H Profile

B. Kleege	Stats	C. Sacomandi
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.86% (54-72)	Career Total W/L	30.77% (8-18)
2	Clay	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Kleege vs C. Sacomandi Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bruce Kleege has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Celso Sacomandi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bruce Kleege, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Celso Sacomandi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Bruce Kleege has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Celso Sacomandi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Bruce Kleege has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Celso Sacomandi winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Bruce Kleege has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 24/21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/8). Celso Sacomandi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 6/15).
Player level: In the last year, Bruce Kleege has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Celso Sacomandi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bruce Kleege winning 2 times and Celso Sacomandi being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Bruce Kleege winning 4 and Celso Sacomandi winning 0.
The last match between Bruce Kleege and Celso Sacomandi was at the Brasilia CH, 09-08-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Bruce Kleege getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bruce Kleege has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Celso Sacomandi has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bruce Kleege has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Celso Sacomandi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Bruce Kleege has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Celso Sacomandi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Bruce Kleege vs Celso Sacomandi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Kleege vs C. Sacomandi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Kleege	Stats	C. Sacomandi
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Kleege Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berkeley CH - 29-04-1985
R2 Danie VisserD. Visser	W	6-4 2-6 7-6	Stats
R3 Todd WitskenT. Witsken	L	7-6 6-1	Stats
Kitzbuhel - 23-07-1984
R2 Christophe Roger VasselinC. Roger	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Travemunde CH - 02-07-1984
R3 Raul Antonio ViverR. Antonio	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Hans SimonssonH. Simonsson	W	6-4 7-6	Stats

View All

C. Sacomandi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Santos CH - 18-07-1983
R3 Tadeu LuizT. Luiz	L	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Sao Paulo CH - 23-08-1982
R4 Carlos KirmayrC. Kirmayr	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R3 Alexandre HocevarA. Hocevar	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Brasilia CH - 09-08-1982
R3 Bruce KleegeB. Kleege	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Campos CH - 19-07-1982
R3 Mark DicksonM. Dickson	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Kleege vs C. Sacomandi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Kleege	Stats	C. Sacomandi
42.86% (54/72)	YTD Win/Loss	30.77% (8/18)
44.93% (133/163)	Sets Win/Loss	32.14% (18/38)
48.36% (1475/1575)	Games Win/Loss	44.06% (215/273)
42.62% (26/35)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
53.33% (24/21)	Clay Win/Loss	28.57% (6/15)
20.00% (2/8)	Indoor Hard W/L	33.33% (1/2)
20.00% (2/8)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
598.05	Average Opponent Rank	601.69
16.67% (1/5)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (1/3)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
22.86% (8/27)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
54.32% (44/37)	Challenger W/L	32.00% (8/17)
44% (53/120)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	28% (7/25)
20% (1/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
60% (3/5)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
42% (16/38)	Deciding Set Win %	40% (2/5)
79% (56/44)	1st Set Won, Won Match	70% (10/7)
21% (56/12)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	30% (10/3)
14% (69/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	6% (16/1)